You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
My main takeaway is how many more people got to see the smaller panels at the tail end of the counts, many of these panels would have had 20, 50 people under normal circumstances. Plus, unlike the marquee panels, these don't tend to get press coverage or put online afterwards. Would be nice if CCI could make these available, categorize and promote them in the future.
That's a good point. For small panels @home was a boon. I think all the panels should have been put online all along. They are officially recorded anyways, why not put them online?Going forward I think that comic-con should always have a virtual component. It's not going to cut into in person attendance. It will open up comic-con to everyone that can't attend in person. I don't see a downside. Third parties already do this for the bigger panels. CCI should do it for every panel.
I think You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login 's last post is right, it's silly to compare the promotional monster of a good SDCC Hall H panel to a youtube video. Especially on something like "social engagement."I have my own selfish reasons, there are always dozens (at least) of small panels I would love to see but just can't. I would happily pay a bit to watch them afterwards.
This is what Comic-Con HQ was supposed to be for.For $5 a month, you could view a selection of panels online, allowing you to catch up on those smaller panels you couldn't attend in person, even You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login 's panel . Great idea, failed execution. Oh well .